Update July 2005: P&A Investigations

With fraud now the fastest growing industry in the UK and losses overtaking traditional bad debt write offs, itçs highly likely that a number of your clients will have suffered a loss in recent times. That could lead to a serious situation when business confidence, in a benign economy, is at a low.

Business proprietors tend to get very little guidance from any of their professional or trade bodies to enable them to manage a fraud problem - and unless the sums are very substantial, the police appear to be under resourced to be able to provide practical, on the spot assistance. Research tells us that when a fraud is discovered the last person to be told is often the accountant, much less the local trade association or their competitors. Itçs almost as if business proprietors are ashamed at being caught out!

Apart from the physical loss there are other considerations; regulated advisors, such as accountants and banks, have a legal duty to report any criminal activity or fraud to the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) as soon as it comes to their attention. If the 'incident' is managed under a lawyer's 'cloak of legal privilege', it would enable the investigation to be carried out in an orderly manner with controlled exposure of the case to the media and the Law Enforcement Agencies. This is particularly important if there are elements of non-compliance of regulations or personnel disciplinary issues that are likely to confront the business proprietors.

However, not all lawyers are qualified to deal with issues in respect of fraud or money laundering. A call to P&A Investigations by the proprietors will enable us to ascertain whether the client's lawyers are suitable - if not, we will make recommendations. P&A Investigations will lead the detailed investigation, using the businesses accountants to carry out the financial forensic work if they have the capability. This joint approach enables the case to come to a satisfactory conclusion.

Laurie Beagle, an accomplished consultant in process strategy and development heads up this specialised division of P&A and is supported by Fred Parr. Both are very experienced consultants in the field of fraud prevention and detection - both have considerable commercial experience - Fred spent 16 years as a senior detective in the commercial fraud section of New Scotland Yard, and has many years experience of commercial fraud investigation in the private sector. They are available to give lectures at client events, to provide on site training for key personnel of client firms and, of course, to respond to requests for assistance or to review current policies. The Division has a comprehensive schedule of capabilities from practical pre-emptive reviews at one end of the spectrum, to very detailed investigations and support where serious loss is revealed.

There is a schedule of capabilities at www.pandareceivables.com/investigations-capabilities.html. Some examples of recent cases are attached and demonstrate the wide remit of this division.

If you would like us to support a client seminar, provide training or have a client with a fraud problem, speak to Laurie Beagle or Fred Parr on 0114 278 8868 or email investigations@pandareceivables.com.

Example Cases:

Employee (Expenses) Theft

A Borough Councillor and former mayor was charged with 16 counts of falsifying his expense claims. The charges were brought following a lengthy investigation of the Borough Council. We were instructed by the defence team to investigate the evidence gathered by the police and also to examine the Council's systems and procedures in respect of Councillors' expenses.

Our investigation revealed a number of discrepancies in respect of the various charges together with shortcomings in the Council's systems. Following our report the majority of charges were subsequently dropped. The former Councillor pleaded guilty to a small number of charges totalling around £1,500 and received a suspended sentence.

Employee Theft - Investigation

A physical stock take at a branch of a DIY Company revealed significant shortfalls against the Companyçs stock records. The manager of the branch was questioned but claimed that the difference was due to spoilt stock and replacements not recorded on the computer.

Our investigations revealed that in addition to the missing stock significant amounts of cash had also been stolen, and to conceal the theft, the suspect was making up the daily shortfalls from the following days' takings. The branch manager was subsequently charged with 7 counts of theft and false accounting.

Bribery

A small family owned computer consumable company tendered and won a large contract for supply of consumables to a large national Company operating a chain of department stores. For several years, the Company was successful in retaining the contract despite intense competition from its larger rivals.

Following a family dispute, one of the directors left the Company and subsequently sent copies of the Company's tenders and correspondence to the Department store. We discovered the Company had provided the Storeçs buyer with a luxury car, free of charge, for a number of years and had also made significant payments to the buyer. Correspondence revealed that the buyer who was in sole charge of this contract was opening the competitorsç tenders early and tipping off the Company with their prices.

Further, the Department Store used sample testing of certain key items to evaluate contracts.

The Company was informed in advance of these items and ensured that its prices were below its competitors. The prices for the remaining items were then proportionately increased.

The Department Store decided not to prosecute but instead dismissed the buyer and brought a large civil claim against the Company. This claim was initially resisted but subsequently settled for a large sum.

Breach of fiduciary duties (and ineffective investigation)

The managing director ("MD") of a UK subsidiary of a large American Company was suspected of impropriety and breach of his fiduciary duties. Following a brief internal review, it was decided to dismiss the MD for gross misconduct. The MD was summoned to the area director's office and summarily dismissed.

Following his dismissal, the former MD went to his office and removed the Company's desk top computer, carried this to his car and drove off. Upon discovery, the directors sent a messenger to his house to collect the computer but discovered that its hard disk had been completely erased. Further investigation revealed that the MD had also over ridden the Companyçs back up procedures and his files had not been backed up by the Company. The former MD brought a large claim against the Company for unfair dismissal. Despite enlisting computer specialists, the Company was unable to recover the contents of the MDçs computer.

Our investigation revealed that the Company[s internal review had not been conducted properly and adequate supporting documentation had not been gathered prior to dismissal.

The investigation did however reveal some breaches by the former MD, although, gross misconduct could not be conclusively proved. The claim was subsequently settled.

Computer Forensics

Identified anomalies in user activity that ultimately revealed bogus employees were engaged in acquiring intelligence on behalf of competitors. The true identity of the recipients were revealed, tracked down and the misappropriated propriety information was retrieved and their system secure against future breaches

Employees Screening

A major firm of Insurance brokers was approached by a lady seeking employment and offering to bring with her business which would attract at least £1 million in commissions. Although the department head was anxious to employ her, we were asked to investigate and check her employment history.

It was immediately discovered that the details provided by the subject could not be verified and when her previous maiden name was ascertained from research sources, a new and more sinister picture emerged. It was revealed that the applicant had three previous convictions for major fraud and her last court appearance had resulted in a 4 year prison sentence.

Media coverage reported that the Judge on that occasion had been extremely critical of her employer for not having carried out sufficient checks into her previous employment history.

Our client's offer of employment to the applicant was withdrawn.

Investigations

A UK based company was contacted by an offshore organisation with a view to commencing to trade and setting up a credit account. The UK company decided that they would trade and set up a small credit account of about £3,000. However the first order received was in excess of £13,000. To accommodate their new customer the UK Company agreed to accept bankers drafts in payment for their goods prior to shipping the same. In a two-month period goods were supplied to value of about £100,000. However on being banked the UK Company discovered that they had not received Bankers Drafts, but cheques and these were returned unpaid as they were forged.

The UK Company thought that they had covered all the possibilities in trying to prevent this from happening; however it can be seen that they had not. This company had an extremely experienced Credit Control Department. Do not think that it cannot happen to you.

These few case studies are just a small example of the varied help and support we are able to give to your clients. We believe we can add value to your client relationship by giving you support and assistance in promoting awareness of an increasing problem that businesses undoubtedly face. There is more information about the capabilities of P&A Investigations at www.pandareceivables.com

July 2005

< back to news headlines